Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | faragon's commentslogin

Accurate or not, there are many risks other than those that could bring AI companies value to 0. E.g., systems not requiring passing over all the data continuously, but in small regions running at L2-L3 cache memory speed. Once someone figures out that, the need for high bandwidth memory would end.

This is the closer we have for having a full 32-bit x86 system with FPU. Even with the lower precision in the x87 FPU by using the FPGA DSP blocks, eventually having a "486DX" (i486 instruction set + FPU) would enable running a massive amount of PC software (1980..2000's). Taking his z386 core (based in the i386 microcode) and adding 486-class optimizations, including a simplified dual I/D L1 cache, vs the unified but more complex L1 cache in i486's, really is a beautiful and imaginative approach.


How many DOS games used an FPU though? I can only think of one.


Mobygames got a list [1]. No idea on accuracy.

1. [https://www.mobygames.com/game/attribute:115/include_dlc:tru...]


A lot more than I thought! I wonder if that’s _requires_ FPU or can use an FPU.


The $64k question! The very first title on the list f. e., Falcon 3.0, only requires it for the "hi-fi" flight model. Quake certainly needs an FPU. Don't know about the others.

So or so, the info needs to be verified for accuracy, e. g. if a 486DX-specced title really needed (or profited from the the presence of) an FPU, or if was just a speed requirement/recommendation. And some of the game covers's spec boxes don't mention anything about an FPU at all. Etc.


Games, very few, if any. But software in general, quite a lot.


8K decoding needs HW acceleration, unless having 8-16 cores with AVX-512.


Yes, but that's way out of budget for most consumers.


Actually not really, Lunar Lake chips with Xe2 graphics have VVC decoding in hardware which can do 8K.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versatile_Video_Coding


They were likely saying that 8K displays are way out of budget for most consumers.


Where I live, we have 50 inch 8k TVs for 180 USD.


Do many people use Firefox on 50" 8K TVs as opposed to regular monitors? I wouldn't want such a large display on a computer unless the computer is being used as media server. And my experience when I got new monitors for work about 18 months ago, was that decent ones at higher than 1440p were more expensive than I felt was worth it.

Also, I expect one or more of the following from a 50" 8K TV at that price:

- Bundled with ad/spyware.

- Poor image and/or sound quality.

- Doesn’t last long, or image quality very noticeably degrades after a relatively short amount of use.

I also wonder if perhaps it’s still like back when HD was still new, where TVs would advertise “Full HD”, but were actually only referring to being able to accept a 1080p input signal which they would then downscale to their <720p LCD panels.


All of that is probably true, but playing YouTube on such a cheap TV is a very valid use-case for Firefox.


1) open-weights

2) critical mass

3) de-facto monopoly

4) closed-weights on frontier models

5) profit


Thank you very much! Is the SSFv2 mapper supporting memory writes in the MiSTer FPGA, too? (Megadrive and/or 32x cores). Also, now that there's a SH3 core already available ([1] for replicating the Cave CV1000 system), it could be mind blowing having a system with 512MB of RAM on a SH3 at 100MHz running Linux.

[1] https://github.com/ika-musume/HS3


Hi!

Honestly, no idea if Krikkz's Extended SSFv2 is even implemented on MiSTer. I'd have to check but considering the rarity of it I'd be surprised if it was there.

Porting Linux to SH3 is surely easier than what it has been for SH2 (SH7604, more precisely); and considering it has 512MB of RAM you probably can just get away with a non-stripped to the bones Linux image (And initramfs, of course). It surely sounds like a good playground.


They may consider rewriting their web-based apps into native apps using IA.



Microsoft degrading user experience plus lower price on Mac computers it maybe their downfall. E.g., removing local accounts, unwanted advertising, arbitrary decisions (forced TPM requirement), etc.


"All your Copilot are belong to us"


Wasn't their target to replace humans with AI? Why is that not applicable to their business?


Hiring sprees signal growth to the market. Growth is the dominant metric for pumping the IPO stock price considering they're nowhere near profitability.

Doesn't matter if they're needed or not. They can always be fired later.


Maybe they know something more than they advertise publicly


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: