Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Some of us were asking for this machine.

As a developer who builds large, complex projects (it's not uncommon for a build to take 40 minutes on a 16-core Xeon workstation), the Mac Pro is exactly the type of workstation I'd be interested in.

(The display is another story. That's definitely targeting the media production vertical.)



Wouldn't someone like you be better served on a 32 or 64 core Threadripper workstation then?

I assume there's I/O bottlenecking in there somewhere, but for the rest, surely you're not 100% pegging all 16 cores all the time, but more parallelism would still benefit you to a certain extent... While not costing $6k+ for a base 8 core machine.


Or even have a dedicated build server/farm with object caching. At some point building on your own machine is not a great solution.


If you're building Apple projects, it might be hard or impossible to offload that to other operating system.


GP said they were using a Xeon workstation, so I assumed it's not an Apple offering already.


iMac Pro has a 18-core Xeon W option.


I guess I meant, usually people with Mac systems call them a Mac of some sort, not just a generic "Workstation".


If you're targeting Apple platforms with your builds, just how does a Threadripper workstation address the problem? (And don't say Hackintosh...)


https://github.com/tpoechtrager/osxcross/

It may not be a viable solution for every project, but it does work for many.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: